Abstract argumentation systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argumentation Context Systems: A Framework for Abstract Group Argumentation
We introduce a modular framework for distributed abstract argumentation where the argumentation context, that is information about preferences among arguments, values, validity, reasoning mode (skeptical vs. credulous) and even the chosen semantics can be explicitly represented. The framework consists of a collection of abstract argument systems connected via mediators. Each mediator integrates...
متن کاملTowards Advanced Systems for Abstract Argumentation
Within the last years, and in particular due to the first edition of the International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA) in 2015, the field of formal argumentation has seen an increasing number of systems for Dung’s abstract argumentation framework. However, the majority of the current approaches rely on reductions to other solving paradigms like SAT-solving and Answe...
متن کاملChange in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation Systems
An argumentation system can undergo changes (addition or removal of arguments/interactions), particularly in multiagent systems. In this paper, we are interested in dynamics of abstract bipolar argumentation systems, i.e. argumentation systems using two kinds of interaction: attacks and supports. We propose change characterizations that use and extend previous results defined in the case of Dun...
متن کاملRevisiting Support in Abstract Argumentation Systems
The original argumentation framework by Dung has been extended in various ways, from adding values and preferences to more advanced relations. A number of such generalizations studied the problem of positive interactions between argument, which has led to the development of evidential, necessary and deductive supports and their respective frameworks. It is thus natural to compare those relation...
متن کاملRelating Concrete Argumentation Formalisms and Abstract Argumentation
There are a wide variety of formalisms for defeasible reasoning that can be seen as implementing concrete argumentation on defeasible rules. However there has been little work on the relationship between such languages and Dung’s abstract argumentation. In this paper we identify two small fragments on which many concrete defeasible formalisms agree. The two fragments are closely related, as we ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Artificial Intelligence
سال: 1997
ISSN: 0004-3702
DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00041-0